Commissioner OK with MLB paying for A-Rod evidence

Sports

Commissioner OK with MLB paying for A-Rod evidence

By Ken Davidoff

October 26, 2013 | 9:18pm

ST. LOUIS — With the ethics of his investigators under attack by Alex Rodriguez and his attorneys, commissioner Bud Selig defended the methodology that led Major League Baseball to suspend A-Rod for 211 games.

“I’m very comfortable with that,” Selig said Saturday at Busch Stadium, after giving the Roberto Clemente Award to former Met Carlos Beltran of the Cardinals. “Look, I’m not a lawyer in that area. I’m not a lawyer altogether. But our people, and I know it’s now been written over and over again, I’m very comfortable with what they did and how they did it.

“I’ve been in baseball now 50 years. I thought I had seen everything, but apparently I hadn’t.”

Rodriguez’s appeal against Major League Baseball, currently on hiatus until Nov. 18, has grown acrimonious. Since the hearing began on Sept. 30, Rodriguez has filed two lawsuits, one against Selig and MLB and a second against Yankees team physician Christopher Ahmad and his hospital, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center.

In the suit against MLB and Selig, Rodriguez accuses baseball of conducting a “witch hunt” against him and alleges myriad episodes of misbehavior by MLB’s Department of Investigations. Baseball issued a statement on Oct. 4, the same day the suit was filed, denying all of the allegations.

On Oct. 18, The Post reported exclusively that MLB COO Rob Manfred testified in the hearing he authorized the payment of $125,000 in cash to a Florida man named Gary Jones in return for Biogenesis documents that turned out to be stolen.

Manfred and Rodriguez’s lead attorney Joseph Tacopina have exchanged insults and accusations. Selig, while professing his desire to stay above the fray, did tell a small group of reporters, “I’m sorry for what you all have to listen to every day.”

Later, while discussing the overall state of the game, Selig said, “The situation in New York is not one you dream about.”

The nightmare figures to last until about Christmas, when independent arbitrator Fredric Horowitz is expected to render his decision.

 

Changes coming to MLB bids for Japan players

Joel Sherman

Joel Sherman

Changes coming to MLB bids for Japan players

By Joel Sherman

October 26, 2013 | 11:29pm

The MLB Commissioners Office and Nippon Professional Baseball are closing in on a posting agreement that the sides are optimistic will be in place by Nov. 1, two sources told The Post.

The best pitcher in Japan, Masahiro Tanaka, is expected to be posted this offseason, and the Yankees are likely to be aggressive in trying to win the post.

There had been speculation the system would undergo radical changes, with perhaps even the teams with the three highest posting bids all gaining the rights to negotiate with the players. I have been told there will be alterations in the process, but still only one team will win the post and have exclusive negotiating rights.

It is possible, as a way to give the player more power to chose his destination, he might get to pick a singular team from, say, the top two or three bidders.

The posting system was created mainly to give Japanese teams a way to get paid if they agree to let a player go prior to free agency (Japanese players need nine years of service to gain free agency to come to the States). In the process up to now, interested MLB teams gave a sealed bid and the high bidder was awarded an exclusive 30-day period to sign the player. If no deal was struck, the player stayed in Japan and no second American team received an opportunity to sign the player.

In the most significant recent examples, the Red Sox, with a bid of $51.1 million, won the rights to negotiate with Daisuke Matsuzaka and the Rangers, with a bid of $51.7 million, won the rights to negotiate with Yu Darvish. Teams still have to sign the player after winning the post. Both MLB and the Players Association were hoping a system could be forged in which the post was not quite as expensive as a way to keep the money here for players.

The winning post does not count toward salary and thus is not calculated in for purposes of figuring out the luxury tax payroll. That is one reason Tanaka — beyond talent — entices the Yankees, who are trying to get under the $189 million payroll threshold for 2014.

The Padres recently completed organizational meetings in Arizona and came away believing they will retain Chase Headley in his walk year rather than trade him. San Diego will listen to offers for the switch-hitting third baseman, who has been on the Yankees’ radar.

The Padres will listen if teams are interested. But San Diego believes it is more in a win-now mode and will deal him only for cost-effective players ready for the majors now or close to the majors. Padres officials feel, because of that, the Yanks are not a match. This is one of the problems of having an unproductive farm system — not only are you not feeding the big league team useful parts, but those parts do not exist for trades.

Bill Sharman Became A Legend For And By Thanking Everyone

Your mom might’ve told you to write thank-you notes once upon a time, and it seemed like such a chore, an exercise in obsequiousness. Typically, it was rote. Someone slides a sawbuck into a birthday card, you’re condemned to scribble out a few lines of scripted treacle: Thank you so much for the money, I am going to save half and spend the rest on blah blah blah bling bling bling blah, thank you again. Sincerely, a kid expecting money again a year from now.

Children are people of low status. Similarly, so are job applicants, who also are exhorted to pen — to hand-write! — thank-yous to potential bosses after an interview. It’s a rite that shows off your consideration and courtesy, even if it still carries that mercenary air of the strategic. Thanks again for taking the time to meet with me. Sincerely, someone who’s reiterating a desire to be bossed around for years to come. Thank-you notes can still feel like a nuisance. They remind you of being a peasant.

But it doesn’t have to be drudgery. If anything, it becomes a beautiful tool of diplomacy, especially as a person ages. When Bill Sharman died this week, the twice-over Basketball Hall of Fame coach and player (only John Wooden and Lenny Wilkens share that distinction) was remembered as a consummate professional and a gentleman — and, not coincidentally, a prolific writer of letters and notes.

Kobe Bryant’s Instagram memorial to Sharman read as a thank-you note for thank-you notes: “Thank you for all you have done for the game as a player and as a coach. Thank you for your support and handwritten letters of encouragement over the years.” Likewise, Mark Madsen tweeted:

Now, it’s one thing to treat your players with courtesy. Sharman went further, treating writers with a rare degree of courtesy. A former Los Angeles Daily News Lakers beat writer, Ross Siler, posted a Sharman letter to Facebook this week, explaining that it was the only handwritten note he ever received as a sportswriter. Sharman wrote it to him in gratitude for a reverent, thorough 2004 story Siler wrote about Sharman’s induction to the Hall of Fame as a coach. (Salient details: Sharman was the first Lakers coach to show game film and hire an assistant.) Here’s what the old coach sent him:

Bill Sharman Became A Legend For And By Thanking EveryoneSExpand

Notice the “belated” on there. The guy really was too much.

I asked Siler’s permission to post this. He agreed, and added, “It was the first real feature I wrote after I got on the Lakers beat. I naively thought that every future subject was going to write me one after that.”

No one does write, is the thing. Which is what makes the handwritten note so powerful. People remember when they receive them, especially from higher-status people, because it inverts the traditional thank-you-note relationship. Those are rare, of course. High-status people probably become high-status by writing thank-you notes up, not down. But a few, I suspect, are equal-opportunity thankers.

Some years back, I interviewed B.A.S.S. founder Ray Scott for a piece I was writing for ESPN.com. It was probably a half-hour on the phone, something Scott has done at least a zillion times in his career. Not long afterward, a package arrived at my office. Inside was a copy of Scott’s memoir Bass Boss and a hand-written note, on Ray Scott stationery, thanking me for taking the time. I’m not so green that I didn’t realize what Scott was doing, to some extent; a brilliant self-promoter, Scott knew the value of making an impression on someone calling from ESPN. But it was hard not to be flattered. He was a legend in his sport, presumably rich, and three times my age. I guarantee he had better things to do with his time than to write me a note and send me a book. But then, it occurred to me: This is how Ray Scott becomes Ray Scott. Damned if I didn’t go out and buy my own personalized cards. Because what if that thing really is so easy? Why not give it a shot?

What made Sharman so good at the art of notes was that if he was buttering his bread, he didn’t make that evident. Plus, he seemed to know the best notes, like the best shanks, are the ones no one sees coming. Scott Fowler, the Charlotte Observer sports columnist, wrote this week that as a 7-year-old kid in Texas, he wrote a note to congratulate the Lakers on their championship in 1972. Sharman, then the Lakers’ coach, sent a note back that included autographs from the entire team: Wilt, Riley, West, Hairston, Goodrich. Then, it got even better. Fowler writes:

I loved that sheet of paper.
I studied it to see which player had the best handwriting and which ones included their jersey number. I showed it around. I marveled over it.
And, of course, I lost it.
I told that story in The Charlotte Observer in 2002 — 30 years later — as part of a column about the power of autographs. Sharman’s son-in-law in Florida saw the column. He told Sharman about it.
Sharman, by then a special consultant to the Lakers in California, dug through his files. He found a picture of that 1971-72 team and signed it. He found a copy of the original set of team autographs from that season, which he Xeroxed for me.
Then Sharman stuffed all that in an envelope and sent it to me along with another handwritten note that concluded, “Thanks for bringing back some very nice, exciting memories!”

This, I suspect, is partly why Bill Sharman became Bill Sharman. Not because he flattered people, although clearly that happened. But because he made people feel noticed and important, especially when many of them — the kids, the writers, the writers who were then just kids — weren’t accustomed to feeling either. Even Kobe felt extra special, and Kobe feels only special. Common decency does that, when it’s so uncommon.

[Scott Says]

Brassard’s OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit

Brassard’s OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit

2 hours ago                             AP – Sports

Brassard's OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit
.View gallery

  • .
  • .

                                        DETROIT (AP) — The New York Rangers are finally going home after a season-opening, nine-game road trip, and they are taking a hard-fought win with them.

Sign up for Yahoo Fantasy Hockey in Partnership with NHL.com

And this one was 14 years in the making.

Derick Brassard‘s breakaway goal in the closing seconds of overtime lifted the Rangers to a 3-2 win over the Detroit Red Wings on Saturday night.

Brassard’s first goal of the season, scored with only 12.9 seconds showing on the OT clock, gave New York its first win at Detroit since Jan. 30, 1999.

Pouliot had a goal and an assist, and Mats Zuccarello also scored for New York, which rallied from 1-0 and 2-1 deficits in the final game of its long trip.

”It was really hard on the body. It’s something that’s not going to happen again because of what is happening at MSG,” Brassard said of the stretch away from home.

Sat, Oct 26, 2013

Team Score Links
NY Rangers 3 Final OT
Detroit 2

The Rangers (3-6), who went to overtime for the first time this season, will host Montreal in the opener at renovated Madison Square Garden on Monday.

”As a player, it (home crowd) gives you so much energy on the ice. You play with more emotion,” Brassard said. ”We want to get back and see our fans.”

Rangers coach Alain Vigneault said his team will benefit from the early long trip.

”It’s going to be good for us. It’s been a challenge,” he said. ”We don’t have the record we want but we made some strides in the right direction.”

Cam Talbot stopped 32 shots while filling in for injured regular Henrik Lundqvist.

Game Leaders

Drew Miller and Daniel Alfredsson scored for Detroit, which lost its fourth straight. Jimmy Howard made 37 saves.

”They score more than us. The bottom line is they took the game over from us in the second period,” Red Wings coach Mike Babcock said. ”I thought we fought to get it back in the third period, but in the second we got outskated, turned pucks over in the neutral zone, never got it behind them enough. When we get in their zone we’re one-and-done too quickly.”

Brassard broke the Rangers’ two-game losing streak when he picked up a loose puck just inside the blue line and beat Howard between the pads.

”I only had to scoop up the puck. It was kind of bouncing, so I just closed my eyes and shot,” Brassard said.

Zuccarello tied it at 2 by putting in a rebound 2:18 into the third for his first goal of the season.

View gallery.”

Brassard's OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit

New York Rangers left wing Benoit Pouliot, second from right, celebrates his second period goal agai …

Pouliot had gotten the Rangers even at 1 with a power-play goal with 2:40 remaining in the second period. He put the puck past Howard during a goal-mouth scramble for his first with New York.

Alfredsson’s power-play goal with 11 seconds left in the second period restored Detroit’s lead at 2-1. He netted his second of the season with a one-timed shot from the right circle.

The Rangers had scoring chances earlier but were denied by Howard and the goal post.

Howard dove across the crease to make a spectacular blocker save on Brian Boyle about eight minutes into the middle period. Ryan McDonagh hit a goal post about five minutes into the frame.

Miller gave the Red Wings a 1-0 lead with 2:48 remaining in the first period. He completed a 2-on-1 rush by beating Talbot with a wrist shot from the left circle for his first of the season.

NOTES: Lundqvist missed his second game because of an undisclosed injury. … Seeking to generate more offense, Babcock split up Pavel Datsyuk and Henrik Zetterberg, who had been playing together on the first line. Datsyuk centered RW Daniel Alfredsson and LW Todd Bertuzzi, and Zetterberg was between LW Tomas Tatar and RW Johan Franzen for Detroit, which had scored only three goals in its previous three games. Datsyuk and Zetterberg were back together by late in the second period. … Rangers center J.T. Miller played junior hockey with the suburban-Detroit based Plymouth Whalers of the Ontario Hockey League. … The Red Wings’ healthy scratches were RW Mikael Samuelsson and RW Patrick Eaves.

Brassard's OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit

    • Brassard's OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit
    • Brassard's OT goal gives Rangers win over Detroit

    View Comments (11)

    11 Comments                 My Comments
    Start a discussion

    Comment Guidelines                            
    Popular Now         Newest         Oldest         Most Replied
    Edward
    Reply

    Sorry you didn’t like this comment. Please select one or more options below.

    Please select at least one option below.
    Report Abuse                    

    Mute comments from

    Submit                     Cancel

    Thank you.

     

    You will no longer see comments from this user. Undo

     

    Undo

    • A.S.K.                     3 hours ago

      0                        
      5                        

                              Another weak effort. If we’re not going to give the young forwards consistent ice-time move them for a puck-moving defenseman. Cannot rely on Dats, Z, and Alfredsson to carry you every pucking game.

      More
                              Reply
    • Crown/Hammer                     3 hours ago

      0                        
      3                        

                              way to go blueshirts

      More
                              Reply
    • Vange9435                     2 hours ago

      0                        
      1                        

                              Real positive to end a grueling road trip on a winning note.   The effort was absolutely there and it was great to see the Rangers hard work rewarded with a thrilling win.   It’s very early but Talbot looks like he has the makings of being a strong backup goaltender.   He has excellent poise, and played extremely well in the two games he started in place of Lundqvist.   Finally returning home to the Garden Faithful this Monday.
      LET’S GO RANGERS!!!!!!

      More
                              Reply
    • reg                     2 hours ago

      0                        
      1                        

                              the wings at least got a point out of it.i dont know why people were saying moving to the east was going to be a cakewalk.

      More
                                    Expand Replies (1)                                                                          Reply
    • jolimon                     55 minutes ago

      0                        
      1                        

                              The Wings have Weiss for the next 3 years so everything should be ok.  I wish all those Wing haters would just leave us alone and let us try and make the playoffs like we’ve done for awhile.  And please let us keep our genius GM Ken Holland who continues to let us reload.  Let’s go Red Wings.

      More
                              Reply
    • Comment hidden due to low rating.

      Show Comment

      Brett                     2 hours ago

      9                        
      1                        

                              Too bad the Rangers SUCK. But then again hockey in general blows so I’m not complaining.

      More
                              Reply
    • Tommy                     1 hour ago

      4                        
      0                        

                              DETROIT IS FINISHED:  They are lucky they managed to tie a couple of games or they would be in last place.  Ahhhh…nobody cares anyway.  It’s the G.H.E.T.T.O. team after all.

      More
                              Reply
    • Lol                     31 minutes ago

      1                        
      0                        

                              Hey Cam Talbot looked great. GO Wolfpack!

      More
                              Reply
    • Canadian Bacon1                     1 hour ago

      1                        
      0                        

                              Time to retool the Wings. They seemed to be just going through the motions.

      More
                              Reply
    • Fire Jim Leyland                     3 hours ago

      3                        
      5                        

                              OH Jimmy H.  how we have missed you playing your #$%$ off for the first 40 minutes of a game, to only blow it late or give up the only shootout goal.  You are truly the Tony Romo of the hockey world.  Play like a HOF’er until it counts.  A stellar 3.0 GAA since your return, and an even more stellar 1 win out of your last four.  We as Wings fans can only thank you for your 40 minutes of service a night.  Please dont tell me how its not Jimmy’s fault- if not for him we wouldn’t even be in those games.  It’s not about how well you play its whether you get the win or loss- and Jimmy H, ends up more often than not- not getting the win.  Your new name shall be Jimmy Romo.  There are about 1 million Cowboy fans who will empathize with this.

      More
                                    Expand Replies (4)                                                                          Reply
    • View more comments

    Here’s The Obstruction Rule That Won Game 3 For The Cardinals

    The Cardinals took Game 3 of the World Series on a walkoff obstruction call after Allen Craig tripped over Will Middlebrooks heading to home plate. The umpires all stood by Jim Joyce’s call afterward, but what does the rulebook say?

    Here’s how obstruction is defined:

    OBSTRUCTION is the act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of any runner. Rule 2.00 (Obstruction) Comment: If a fielder is about to receive a thrown ball and if the ball is in flight directly toward and near enough to the fielder so he must occupy his position to receive the ball he may be considered “in the act of fielding a ball.” It is entirely up to the judgment of the umpire as to whether a fielder is in the act of fielding a ball. After a fielder has made an attempt to field a ball and missed, he can no longer be in the “act of fielding” the ball. For example: If an infielder dives at a ground ball and the ball passes him and he continues to lie on the ground and delays the progress of the runner, he very likely has obstructed the runner.

    So, according to that comment, Middlebrooks cannot stay on the ground after attempting to catch a throw, or he has obstructed. Got it. Now, here’s Rule 7.09 (emphasis mine).

    Rule 7.09(i) Comment: When a catcher and batter-runner going to first base have contact when the catcher is fielding the ball, there is generally no violation and nothing should be called. “Obstruction” by a fielder attempting to field a ball should be called only in very flagrant and violent cases because the rules give him the right of way, but of course such “right of way” is not a license to, for example, intentionally trip a runner even though fielding the ball. If the catcher is fielding the ball and the first baseman or pitcher obstructs a runner going to first base “obstruction” shall be called and the base runner awarded first base.

    The context is different—Middlebrooks was no longer “attempting” to field the ball—but note the forgiving language, which gives the umps considerable discretion in making an obstruction call. It’s not clear what Middlebrooks should’ve done, in any case. If he lies prone on the dirt, he might be obstructing, according to the rulebook. If he gets up, he might be obstructing, according to the rulebook. In any case, strict proceduralism wins the day, and so do the Cardinals.

    Controversial obstruction call pushes Cardinals past Red Sox in Game 3 of World Series

    Jeff Passan

    By                                  55 minutes ago                             Yahoo Sports

    ST. LOUIS – Turns out tripping is a penalty in baseball, too. And it’s one that won the St. Louis Cardinals a World Series game.

    A chaotic, back-and-forth night ended with umpire Jim Joyce calling obstruction on Boston Red Sox third baseman Will Middlebrooks, allowing Allen Craig to score the winning run in the bottom of the ninth of a rollicking 5-4 victory that gave St. Louis a two-games-to-one advantage in the series.

    With runners on second and third and one out in the ninth, Jon Jay hit a ground ball that Dustin Pedroia scooped and fired home to nail Yadier Molina at home. As Craig tried to advance to third, Red Sox catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia threw to third base. The ball skipped by Middlebrooks, who fell to the ground and brought Craig down with him. Even though Craig continued running and was tagged out at the plate, Joyce called obstruction, awarding him home and giving the Cardinals a huge victory at Busch Stadium.

    View gallery

    .

    The back-and-forth, topsy-turvy, anything-you-can-do-I-can-do-better (-and-sometimes-worse) third game of the World Series spent nearly four hours with Boston and St. Louis one-upping and -downing each other to see who would go one up and down in the series.

    For the first eight innings, St. Louis and Boston traded moments good and bad, both at times looking brilliant and futile. Both stranded too many runners. Both came up with big hits in big situations. All of it led to Middlebrooks’ fatal fall, which triggered Rules 2.00 and 7.06: obstruction and the umpire awarding the runner a base because of it.

    Glory and devastation in October walk the same paths and find themselves separated by the smallest things. Like an accidental trip. Or an excuse-me swing and a rounded, black elbow pad, which seemed like they were going to cost Boston the game earlier. Because of them, Craig Breslow almost played World Series goat once again. And Matt Carpenter’s check swing and Carlos Beltran‘s elbow pad nearly played their way into Cardinals lore.

    View gallery

    .

    Boston catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia watches as umpire Dana DeMuth calls Allen Craig safe. (AP)

    After Carpenter eked out an infield single and Beltran’s body armor was grazed by a Breslow pitch, red-hot Matt Holliday doubled down the left-field line in the seventh inning to score both and snap a 2-2 tie. With the 100-mph heat of Carlos Martinez and Trevor Rosenthal ready to lock down the final two innings, the game seemed a shoo-in for St. Louis.

    Then Jacoby Ellsbury singled against Martinez to lead off the eighth, Shane Victorino took a pitch to the hip, Pedroia moved them up a base with a groundout and Cardinals manager Mike Matheny walked David Ortiz to load the bases and brought in Rosenthal. Daniel Nava’s force out cut the deficit to one, and rookie Xander Bogaerts, who earlier in the game joined Ty Cobb and Mickey Mantle as the youngest players to triple in a World Series game, bounced a seeing-eye single up the middle to score Victorino and knot it up at 4-4. Boston stranded Nava on third, repeating an oft-seen pattern from St. Louis earlier.

    Particularly awful for the Cardinals was the fourth inning, when they loaded the bases in the fourth inning with no outs. Their easy outs – shortstop Pete Kozma and starting pitcher Joe Kelly – played their roles to perfection with a strikeout and popout, and Carpenter ended the threat with a popout himself. Putting two on in the fifth against reliever Felix Doubront proved no better, as David Freese flied out to close the frame. And again in the seventh, with Holliday on third and no outs, a pair of strikeouts preceded a fly out that stranded him.

    View gallery

    .

    The Cardinals mob Allen Craig after he scored the winning run in Game 3. (AP)

    St. Louis took a 2-0 lead early when everything Boston starter Jake Peavy threw in the first inning came back at him with similar furor. Carpenter led off with a single to right and moved to second on a Beltran bunt. Holliday followed with an opposite-field single that drove home Carpenter. Matt Adams kept the right-field parade going with another single, and Molina jumped on the next pitch to plate Holliday. In all, St. Louis swung at 12 of Peavy’s 21 pitches in the first inning, an aggressive total even for a team that isn’t all that interested in working counts.

    The eagerness boiled over into the ninth, when Jay swung at both pitches from closer Koji Uehara, who had given up a pinch-hit double to Craig. Pedroia’s play wasn’t enough, and the Cardinals took one more

    Fans react to Fox playing David Ross interview over wild play in World Series Game 3

    Fans react to Fox playing David Ross interview over wild play in World Series Game 3

    Mark Townsend

    By                                  3 hours ago                             Big League Stew

                                            One of the wildest plays so far in the World Series happened in the bottom of the third inning of Game 3. With one out, Matt Holliday hit a soft fly ball into shallow center field that caused a little confusion among the Boston Red Sox fielders.

    Shortstop Stephen Drew bowed out of the play early and gave center fielder Jacoby Ellsbury that “it’s yours, please catch it” look. Ellsbury had a long way to go, too, but had a better angle and seemed to be in good position, but actually overran it slightly and had it bounce off his glove.

    With the ball on the ground, the attention quickly turned to Holliday, who wasn’t exactly busting it out of the batter’s box. Realizing he should easily be at second base, Holliday compounded his first error by unwisely attempting to advance. He wound up getting caught between a rock and a hard place and was easily tagged out.

    It was terrible play on both sides that actually fits right well with this so far sloppy World Series. It was also a play that you’d think would garner some quality on-the-spot commentary and analysis from Fox Sports’ Joe Buck and Tim McCarver. But we’ll never know.

    Instead of Fox’s broadcasters calling the play live, home viewers were forced to sit through audio of a mid-inning interview with Red Sox backup catcher David Ross. He has a beard, after all, so he gets top priority! That meant Buck and McCarver had to wait another 20-30 seconds for the interview to conclude before they could rehash the play and talk over replays.

    That’s a long while in sports time, and needless to say the home viewers and baseball writers alike weren’t pleased.

     

    Okay, but what about Mr. November?

    untitled  d j

    By                                on Oct 25 2013, 1:55p

    <img alt=”” size_name=”large_730″ src=”http://cdn0.sbnation.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/21764499/142954775.0_standard_352.0.jpg” />

    Nick Laham

    In case you missed it, when I was a completely different person — you know, like an hour ago — I questioned Reggie Jackson’s qualifications as Mr. October … and because I am was such a helpful soul, I offered a few candidates to assume the mantle. Which somehow invited this tweet:

    Okay, so I don’t quite understand what that means. But this did remind me that we’ve already got a Mr. November … and yes of course it’s another Yankee. Derek Jeter picked up the nickname in 2001. Thanks to the 9/11 attacks, the World Series was delayed by a few days, and so Game 4 started on Halloween.

    I say it started on Halloween because by the time Jeter came to the plate in the bottom of the 10th inning, the clocks in New York had just struck midnight, and November. And Jeter did this:

     

    But does Jeter deserve the “Mr. November” nickname? After all, there were still three more games to play in that World Series. There were also three World Series games played in November of 2009, and one in 2010. And it’s worth remembering that the Yankees didn’t wind up winning the ’01 World Series, which the Diamondbacks took when Luis Gonzalez delivered his single in the bottom of the ninth inning of Game 7.

    I looked at everybody. Gonzalez did deliver that hit against Mariano Rivera. But he was just 3 for 13 in November, and his single was a broken-bat looper that just found the right spot. We might also consider Edgar Renteria, whose three-run homer off Cliff Lee accounted for all three Giants runs in their Series-clinching victory three years ago. But that was just Game 5, and Renteria’s homer was his only November hit.

    Jeter, meanwhile? He’s the all-time leader with seven November games, nine November hits, and 25 November at-bats. At least one of which will never bee forgotten by Yankees fans, Diamondbacks fans, or Byung-Hyun Kim. I do think we need to find a new Mr. October. But the old Mr. November is the right Mr. November.

    THE DOUBLE STEAL THAT BROUGH DOWN THE RED SOX

     

        By                             on Oct 25 2013, 5:59p

    <img alt=”” size_name=”large_730″ src=”http://cdn2.sbnation.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/21776137/20131024_jla_ad7_137.0_standard_352.0.jpg” />

    Bob DeChiara-USA TODAY Sports

    Like you, I’ve got little use for the postgame interviews on the field or in the locker room, because it’s so terribly rare that anyone actually says anything interesting. I rarely even look at the game stories that get published, because there’s so little chance of learning anything about the game (the game specifically, or the sport generally).

    Sure, I was wondering about Craig Breslow’s performance in Game 2. I wrote about it. But I didn’t think to look for a quote. But now we’ve got this, an actual essay written in complete sentences by the articulate southpaw:

    We were aware that the Cardinals might attempt a double steal when I  entered the game. I knew that they had some guys on base that had some  speed. I tried to vary my looks, vary my holds, step off the rubber and  do what I could to disrupt their timing. But when Pete Kozma took off for third and John Jay went behind him for second, I gave Jarrod Saltalamacchia a pretty tough pitch to handle.

    It was a fastball, and once I started to commit to the plate, I saw  that they were going. I tried to give Salty something he can handle, and  it ended up being something he had to reach up for. In that case, I  need to do a better job of holding runners. Getting to second and third  with less than two outs changed the whole inning, including how I’m  going to pitch to Daniel Descalso.

    In walking Descalso to load the bases, I probably got a little bit ahead  of myself and got a little bit quick to the plate. Initially, with a  double play still a possibility, we wanted to pound him down and away  and then sink the ball in. The approach changed a little bit once they  executed the double steal. There were runners on second and third with  less than two outs, where a strikeout would have been the best outcome.  We threw a couple of breaking balls, and again, I didn’t execute  pitches, resulting in a walk.

    There’s nothing particularly revelatory here. But it’s interesting that Breslow admits that he changed his pitch in the middle of the double-steal attempt, which didn’t work out at all; he not only gave Saltalamacchia a lousy pitch to handle, but he also lost a chance to get ahead of Descalso. And we also find that he changed his approach after the double-steal, which might have led to the critical walk.

    When I wrote about this stretch, I described the walk as the key play in the game. But after reading Breslow’s piece, now I’m wondering if the double-steal was the key play, its impact so dramatic upon everything that followed.

    So, score one for intelligent pitchers writing about themselves. And score another for the running game, and Mike Matheny’s tactical acumen

    Strasburg, Harper, LaRoche all have surgeries

     

    October 26, 2013, 12:00 pm

    Three of the Nationals’ most important players underwent various surgical procedures in the last three days, the club announced Saturday morning, with Stephen Strasburg and Adam LaRoche each having their elbows repaired and Bryce Harper having his knee fixed.

    All face recovery times of 4-to-6 weeks and are expected to be ready for the start of spring training, the Nationals said.

    Strasburg had arthroscopic surgery on Friday to remove bone chips from his right elbow, a previously undisclosed injury. The “clean-up” procedure was performed in Los Angeles by orthopedist Neal ElAttrache.

    Strasburg had to be scratched from two consecutive September starts with what the Nationals said at the time was “forearm tightness,” an ailment he experienced while playing catch the day before he was scheduled to pitch. The right-hander did return to make two final starts before the season ended and reported no problems, but the forearm tightness may have been a byproduct of the elbow injury.

    “I don’t really know why it’s happening,” he said upon missing his first appearance. “When it happens, it happens. It’s like a strong cramp, so I just think I would put us in a bind if I went out there and felt it. We’d definitely be down some pitchers.”

    This is the second time Strasburg has needed elbow surgery in his career, though this minor procedure was in no way related to the ligament replacement surgery he had in 2010.

    Strasburg has dealt with a few other minor injuries since returning from the Tommy John surgery in 2011, but until now none were tied to his arm. The 25-year-old went 8-9 with a 3.00 ERA in 30 starts this season, totaling a career-high 183 innings. He’s expected to resume his throwing program in 4-to-6 weeks, though full recovery for pitchers who have bone chips removed from their elbows typically is 3-to-4 months. That should still coincide with the start of spring training.

    Harper’s surgery was less of a surprise, considering the lingering left knee pain he experienced during the season’s final 4 1/2 months, all a result of his collision with the right field wall at Dodger Stadium on May 13.

    The procedure Harper had performed on him Wednesday in Vail, Colo., by orthopedist Richard Steadman involved the debriding and repairing of the bursa sac in his left knee, which was damaged on the play in Los Angeles.

    He spent more than a month on the disabled list and was examined by orthopedist James Andrews, who said surgery wasn’t necessary at the time, but Harper admitted at season’s end he hadn’t been 100 percent healthy since the initial collision.

    Harper, who also dealt with injuries to his left hip and ribcage, wound up playing in only 118 games this season, hitting .274 with 20 homers, 58 RBI and an .854 OPS. He’s expected to resume workouts in 4-to-6 weeks and be fully healed by the start of spring training.

    LaRoche endured through a difficult season himself, hitting a career-low .237 with 20 homers and 62 RBI in 152 games, but he never reported any trouble with his elbow. He had surgery on Wednesday, though, to remove loose bodies from his left elbow, a procedure performed in the District by team medical director Wiemi Douoguih.

    LaRoche, who signed a two-year, $24 million contract with the Nationals last winter, will resume workouts in 4-to-6 weeks and is expected to be ready for the start of spring training.